Lesion catalogue

Browse Atlas

Lesion / Hematologic & lymphoproliferative malignancies

Langerhans cell histiocytosis, disseminated/high-risk

Also known as: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (Letterer-Siwe disease)

Updated 2026-10-10 Suggest an edit

Overview and definition

Disseminated/high-risk Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is the most aggressive end of the LCH spectrum: multisystem disease with involvement of "risk organs"—the hematopoietic system, liver, and/or spleen—that carries the highest mortality and always requires systemic therapy.[1][2][3] It is a clonal myeloid neoplasm driven by activating mutations of the MAPK (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) pathway in CD1a+/CD207+ histiocytes, and the disseminated phenotype is thought to arise when the driver mutation is acquired in a self-renewing bone-marrow progenitor rather than a committed dendritic-cell precursor.[1][2][4] It is predominantly a disease of infants and very young children.[2][3] Within the jaws, bone and alveolar involvement most often affects the posterior mandible, producing lytic destruction that can loosen teeth.[5][6] A jaw lesion may be the presenting sign of occult multisystem disease, so recognition mandates full staging; definitive care is multiagent chemotherapy, increasingly supplemented by MAPK-targeted agents.[2][7][8]

Terminology and classification

The current framework is the 2016 Histiocyte Society revised classification, which places LCH in the Langerhans-related "L group" of histiocytic neoplasms.[9] Disease is stratified by extent into single-system (unifocal or multifocal) and multisystem forms; multisystem disease is further divided by risk-organ status, with risk-organ-positive (RO+) disease equated with "high-risk" disseminated LCH.[2][10] Diagnosis requires CD1a and CD207 (langerin) expression in lesional histiocytes.[1][11]

  • Preferred term: Langerhans cell histiocytosis, multisystem, risk-organ-positive (high-risk/disseminated).
  • Useful historical alias: Letterer-Siwe disease, denoting the acute disseminated infantile form.[3][12]
  • Obsolete umbrella terms retained only to prevent confusion: histiocytosis X, Hand-Schüller-Christian disease, and eosinophilic granuloma.[12]

Reclassification as a myeloid neoplasm reflects detection of the clonal driver mutation in hematopoietic precursors.[1][13][14]

Epidemiology

LCH overall affects roughly 4.6 to 8.9 children per million per year, with a slight male predominance (about 1.2:1).[1][13][15] Disseminated/high-risk disease is a minority subset—fewer than about 15% of pediatric cases—and clusters sharply in infancy, typically presenting before age 2 years and sometimes in the neonatal period.[2][3] Age-specific incidence of disseminated LCH peaks in the first year of life and declines steeply thereafter.[16] In U.S. registry data, incidence is higher among Hispanic children and lower among Black children.[1][14]

Among osseous sites, craniofacial and skull-base involvement is well recognized; within the jaws specifically, the posterior mandible is the most common location, though the maxilla and alveolar process may also be affected.[5][6]

Clinical presentation

The hallmark of the disseminated form is multiorgan involvement with constitutional illness in a young child: fever, failure to thrive, and hepatosplenomegaly with hematologic cytopenias signaling risk-organ disease.[11][12]

  • Skin: involved in the large majority of disseminated cases, classically a seborrhea-like, scaly or crusted papular eruption on the scalp and in flexural/diaper folds, with petechiae, vesicles, or ulceration.[3][11]
  • Reticuloendothelial/hematologic: massive hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and pancytopenia; bile-duct infiltration can cause sclerosing cholangitis, and gastrointestinal infiltration can cause malabsorption and diarrhea.[11][12]
  • Endocrine/CNS: arginine vasopressin deficiency (diabetes insipidus) from hypothalamic–pituitary infiltration, which often precedes or accompanies diagnosis.[8][11]
  • Bone: pain, swelling, or pathologic fracture; vertebra plana is characteristic.[11][18]
  • Oral/maxillofacial: gingival swelling, erythema or ulceration, bleeding, pain with mastication, loosened or prematurely erupting teeth; these may be the first manifestation.[5][18][19]

Red flags are risk-organ dysfunction (cytopenias, hepatic dysfunction, hypoalbuminemia/coagulopathy) and features overlapping hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, which mark a rapidly progressive, potentially fatal course in infants.[2][7]

Radiographic findings

Location and distribution

Jaw lesions favor the posterior mandible, with the maxilla less often involved; in disseminated disease, jaw lesions are frequently multiple and accompanied by lytic lesions of the calvarium and skull base.[5][6][20] Two patterns are described: an intraosseous type centered within medullary bone and an alveolar type centered on the tooth-bearing bone; both patterns occur.[6]

Periphery and shape

Lesions are typically radiolucent with ill-defined or "punched-out" margins, sometimes becoming "moth-eaten" when multifocal and aggressive.[5][21] A sharply demarcated, rounded border may be seen, and calvarial lesions characteristically show beveled edges from uneven destruction of the inner and outer cortical plates.[22][23] Reactive marginal (perilesional) sclerosis can accompany more indolent lesions.[21][23]

Internal architecture

The lucency is usually structureless, without mineralized matrix, and may appear unilocular or multilocular.[5][21] No internal bone-forming or chondroid matrix is expected.[22]

Effects on teeth and the alveolar process

When the alveolar bone is destroyed, teeth lose their bony support and appear to hang within the lucency—the classic "floating teeth" appearance—often with tooth displacement.[5][18] Alveolar destruction often begins below the crest, producing a "scooped-out" defect with loss of the lamina dura, unlike the crest-down pattern of inflammatory periodontitis; in infants it may be associated with premature eruption or exfoliation of teeth.[18] Root resorption is not a dominant feature.

Effects on adjacent structures and growth pattern

Lesions can be expansile with cortical thinning or perforation and an associated soft-tissue mass; mandibular lesions may show periosteal new-bone formation (solid or, occasionally, spiculated/sunburst), and surrounding inflammatory change is common—features that closely mimic osteomyelitis.[6][23] Internal fluid-like areas and perilesional sclerosis have been described in jaw lesions.[6] Growth is relatively rapid for an aggressive, destructive process yet remains well localized at the lesional interface.[21]

Recognized variants

  • Secondary aneurysmal-bone-cyst-like change, producing expansile, septated, fluid-containing cavities that can obscure the diagnosis.[21][24]
  • Skull-specific signs when the calvarium is co-involved: the "hole-within-a-hole" appearance and the central "button sequestrum".[22][23]
  • Vertebra plana as the characteristic spinal counterpart.[11][22]

Other imaging findings

For disseminated/high-risk disease, cross-sectional and functional imaging materially change staging and management beyond the jaw films.

Whole-body disease mapping

Whole-body FDG-PET/CT (or PET/MRI, vertex to toes) is favored to detect multisystem and risk-organ involvement and to assess reactivation, because LCH lesions are generally FDG-avid; sensitivity is limited for very small lesions.[8][23]

Craniofacial and CNS assessment

Contrast-enhanced brain/sella MRI is indicated for CNS-risk lesions (orbit, temporal/mastoid, sphenoid, zygomatic and ethmoid bones, maxilla, paranasal sinuses, and anterior or middle cranial fossa with intracranial extension; isolated mandibular lesions are not CNS-risk) and for suspected AVP deficiency; loss of the posterior-pituitary bright spot with infundibular thickening is the classic finding, and MRI best demonstrates intracranial extension and neurodegenerative change.[7][8][22]

Risk-organ characterization

Abdominal ultrasound evaluates hepatosplenic involvement, and chest imaging assesses thoracic disease during staging.[8]

Differential diagnosis

Aggressive, ill-defined jaw radiolucencies with floating teeth in a young child—especially with periosteal reaction and surrounding inflammatory change—overlap most dangerously with infection and malignancy, and the presence of risk-organ or multisystem features is often what redirects the diagnosis toward LCH.[5][6] The highest-yield alternatives are below.

EntityWhy it is consideredBest discriminator
Osteomyelitis of the jawExpansile lytic lesion with periosteal new bone, perilesional sclerosis, and inflammatory soft-tissue change; pain and swelling overlap closelyBiopsy showing CD1a+/CD207+ histiocytes; lack of response to antibiotics and younger age favor LCH[6][25]
Leukemic/lymphomatous infiltrationDiffuse alveolar destruction with loosened teeth and systemic illness in a childMarrow/peripheral-blood blasts or lymphoma immunophenotype rather than langerin-positive histiocytes[5]
Periodontitis, stage III–IV grade C (formerly aggressive periodontitis)Alveolar bone loss with mobile teeth and "floating-tooth" pattern when alveolus and gingiva are involvedMultifocal/intraosseous lesions and histiocytic infiltrate exceed what periodontal inflammation explains[5][19]
Multiple myeloma (adults)Multiple punched-out lucencies with jaw involvementMonoclonal plasma cells and serum/urine paraprotein versus CD1a+ histiocytes[5][21]
Central giant cell granulomaExpansile, sometimes multilocular mandibular radiolucency in a young patientGiant-cell-rich stroma without langerin-positive Langerhans cells[5]

The dominant pitfall is mistaking jaw LCH for osteomyelitis and treating empirically, delaying staging of potentially lethal disseminated disease; any atypical or antibiotic-unresponsive osteolytic jaw lesion in a child warrants biopsy with full immunophenotyping and MAPK/BRAF molecular testing.[6][8]

Histopathology

Diagnosis rests on identifying lesional Langerhans cells—histiocytes with grooved, reniform or "coffee-bean" nuclei, fine chromatin, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm—set in a mixed inflammatory background of eosinophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages, often with multinucleated giant cells.[8][21][24] Lesional cells may constitute anywhere from under 1% to the majority of the infiltrate.[1]

  • Required immunophenotype: CD1a and CD207 (langerin) positivity are the defining markers, supported by S100 and cyclin D1; CD68 shows a paranuclear dot-like pattern, while CD163, CD14, factor XIIIa, and fascin are negative, helping exclude macrophage-lineage histiocytoses.[8][26]
  • Langerin obsoletes Birbeck-granule electron microscopy; however, langerin can be dim or absent in liver, marrow, and CNS lesions, where morphology and other markers carry the diagnosis.[2][24]
  • Molecular correlation: activating MAPK-pathway alterations are nearly universal. BRAF V600E is present in roughly half of cases (VE1 immunostain as surrogate), with MAP2K1, BRAF exon-12 indels, and rarer ARAF/RAS alterations accounting for most of the remainder.[4][8][14]

Radiologic-pathologic correlation is essential: osseous lesions, including those in the jaws, may acquire a secondary aneurysmal-bone-cyst-like, osteoclast-rich architecture that can mask the underlying LCH on both imaging and histology.[21][24] Detection of the driver mutation in circulating hematopoietic precursors tracks with the disseminated phenotype and supports clonality.[2][4][13]

Management and prognosis

Tissue biopsy with full immunophenotyping and MAPK/BRAF molecular testing establishes the diagnosis, and every confirmed case requires staging to define risk-organ status before treatment.[8][11] Workup includes history and examination for common involvement sites, complete blood count and liver/renal/coagulation panels, skeletal survey, whole-body FDG-PET, bone-marrow biopsy when cytopenias are present, and brain/pituitary MRI for CNS-risk or endocrine features; multidisciplinary referral (including dental, endocrine, and oncology) is standard.[7][8]

  • Definitive therapy: disseminated/high-risk disease is treated with 12 months of systemic vinblastine and prednisone with 6-mercaptopurine, the LCH-III–derived standard.[2][7]
  • Targeted and salvage options: MAPK-directed agents (BRAF inhibitors such as dabrafenib/vemurafenib for BRAF V600E; MEK inhibitors otherwise) are used for refractory, rapidly progressive, or critically ill patients, and nucleoside analogues—cladribine, cytarabine, clofarabine—serve as salvage.[2][8][11][14]
  • Local jaw measures (limited curettage, intralesional steroid, indomethacin, bisphosphonates) apply to isolated bone disease, not to disseminated disease, which is governed by systemic control.[8][25]

Prognosis hinges on risk-organ involvement: risk-organ-positive children have an approximately 15% 5-year mortality and high reactivation rates, whereas risk-organ-negative multisystem disease approaches near-universal survival.[1][2][7] Front-line therapy still fails in a substantial proportion of high-risk patients, prompting salvage and targeted treatment.[1][14] BRAF V600E correlates with inferior event-free survival largely because it tracks with disseminated, high-risk extent rather than acting as an independent lesional predictor.[27] Long-term sequelae include permanent AVP deficiency and a late, progressive neurodegenerative syndrome that can emerge years after apparent cure, mandating prolonged surveillance.[1][7]

Special considerations

BRAF/MAPK status and cell of origin

Detection of BRAF V600E (or an alternative MAPK driver) in circulating CD34+ hematopoietic precursors and peripheral blood is characteristic of disseminated high-risk disease and underpins its classification as a myeloid neoplasm; peripheral-blood mutational analysis is an option when lesional biopsy is not feasible.[2][4][8][13] Mutation profiling also identifies actionable targets for BRAF/MEK inhibition.[8]

CNS-risk craniofacial location

Lesions of the orbit, temporal/mastoid, sphenoid, zygomatic and ethmoid bones, maxilla, and paranasal sinuses (and of the anterior or middle cranial fossa with intracranial extension)—anatomy directly relevant to maxillofacial imaging—are designated "CNS-risk" because they are associated with LCH-associated pituitary dysfunction and neurodegeneration, whereas isolated mandibular lesions are not CNS-risk; identifying a CNS-risk lesion should prompt dedicated brain/sella MRI and influences systemic treatment decisions.[2][7][8]

Infant presentation

Because the disseminated form concentrates in infants and may debut with oral or skin findings, skin- or jaw-limited presentations should not be presumed single-system without staging—a notable fraction of apparently localized disease proves multisystem on evaluation.[2][3][28]

ORAD reference data

Radiographic characteristics

18 characteristics

Banded distributions from the ORAD reference database.

Clinical Features

What is the sex of your patient? Male · commonly
What is the sex of your patient?
FindingFrequency
Male commonly
Female commonly
Unknown rarely
What is the race of your patient? Nonblack · usually
What is the race of your patient?
FindingFrequency
Black occasionally
Nonblack usually
Unknown rarely
What is the age of your patient? 0 - 10 · usually
What is the age of your patient?
FindingFrequency
0 - 10 usually
11 - 25 not reported
26 - 50 not reported
50 + not reported
Unknown rarely
Does your patient have pain or paresthesia? Pain · commonly
Does your patient have pain or paresthesia?
FindingFrequency
Pain commonly
No pain sometimes
Unknown rarely

Radiographic Features

Which jaw contains the lesion? Mandible only · commonly
Which jaw contains the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Maxilla only sometimes
Mandible only commonly
Both jaws sometimes
The lesion center is in what region ? Molar region · commonly
The lesion center is in what region ?
FindingFrequency
Incisor region occasionally
Canine/Premolar Region sometimes
Molar region commonly
Ramus region sometimes
TMJ region not reported
Sinus region occasionally
The relationship of the lesion to teeth is: Not tooth associated · usually
The relationship of the lesion to teeth is:
FindingFrequency
Crown associated occasionally
Root associated occasionally
Apex associated occasionally
Missing tooth associated occasionally
Not tooth associated usually
Is the tooth associated with the lesion vital? Vital · usually
Is the tooth associated with the lesion vital?
FindingFrequency
Vital usually
Not vital rarely
Unknown rarely
Please estimate the number of lesions: Generalized · commonly
Please estimate the number of lesions:
FindingFrequency
One not reported
Two rarely
Three or more commonly
Generalized commonly
What is the maximum size of the lesion? 2 to 3 cm · sometimes
What is the maximum size of the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Less than 2 cm sometimes
2 to 3 cm sometimes
Greater than 3 cm sometimes
Where is the origin of the lesion? Central · usually
Where is the origin of the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Central usually
Peripheral sometimes
The borders of the lesion are: Defined but not corticated · commonly
The borders of the lesion are:
FindingFrequency
Corticated sometimes
Defined but not corticated commonly
Diffuse commonly
The loculation of the lesion is: Unilocular · usually
The loculation of the lesion is:
FindingFrequency
Unilocular usually
Multilocular sometimes
Not loculated occasionally
The contents of the lesions are: Radiolucent · usually
The contents of the lesions are:
FindingFrequency
Radiolucent usually
Radiopaque not reported
Mixed not reported
Radiolucent with flecks not reported
Does the lesion contain one or more teeth ? No · usually
Does the lesion contain one or more teeth ?
FindingFrequency
Yes occasionally
No usually
Unknown occasionally
Does the lesion expand the bony cortex? Yes · commonly
Does the lesion expand the bony cortex?
FindingFrequency
Yes commonly
No sometimes
Does the lesion cause root resorption ? No · usually
Does the lesion cause root resorption ?
FindingFrequency
Yes occasionally
No usually
Does the lesion cause tooth displacement or impaction? No · usually
Does the lesion cause tooth displacement or impaction?
FindingFrequency
Yes occasionally
No usually
Atlas sources

References

27 sources
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Cutaneous histiocytoses. Rook's Dermatology Handbook. 2023.
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
    Histiocytic Neoplasms. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Updated 2026-09-16.
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Langerhans cell histiocytosis. National Library of Medicine (MedlinePlus).
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 18
  18. 19
  19. 20
  20. 21
  21. 22
  22. 23
  23. 24
  24. 25
  25. 26
    Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukaemia, The Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Histiocytic Neoplasms. Barbara Bain, David Clark, Bridget Wilkins. Bone Marrow Pathology Fifth Edition. 2019.
  26. 27
  27. 28

Build an interactive differential →

Nearest neighbours

Expand to full map ↗

This lesion (ringed) among its most radiographically similar entries. Region and origin must overlap, so every neighbour is a genuine differential.

Drag to explore · Ctrl/⌘ + scroll to zoom · click a neighbour to recentre

← All lesions