Lesion catalogue

Browse Atlas

Overview and definition

Cleft palate is a congenital structural malformation—not a neoplasm or acquired disease—arising from failure of fusion of the palatal shelves of the maxillary processes between roughly 8 and 12 weeks of gestation.[1] It may be isolated (secondary palate only, posterior to the incisive foramen) or occur as part of cleft lip and palate, which also involves the primary palate (lip and alveolus).[1][2] Isolated cleft palate and cleft lip with/without cleft palate are regarded as distinct entities with overlapping radiologic appearances.[3] Severity ranges from a submucous cleft or bifid uvula to complete clefting of the soft and hard palate.[2] Classification systems include Veau and the anatomically descriptive LAHSHAL palindrome (lip, alveolus, hard palate, soft palate), the latter favored for recording side, site, and completeness.[4][5] More than 300 syndromes are associated, most commonly Pierre Robin sequence, van der Woude, velocardiofacial, Stickler, Treacher Collins, and Goldenhar syndromes.[2]

Radiographic findings

Recognition: In dental practice, cleft palate is usually a known clinical diagnosis, but its bony correlates are encountered on routine imaging. Clefts involving the primary palate (cleft lip and palate) produce the alveolar findings typical of dental imaging; isolated clefts of the secondary palate are seldom evident on panoramic images and are best shown on CBCT/CT as a midline defect of the hard palate and nasal floor. On panoramic radiographs the alveolar/palatal cleft appears as a radiolucent cleavage near the lateral incisor–canine region, and interpretation is complicated by cervical spine overlap and the narrow image layer, which can mimic cysts, tumors, or the normal fossa between alveolar yokes.[6] Distinguishing cleft alveolus with versus without cleft palate on panoramic films is difficult even for experienced observers, because the key discriminator—cleft extension posterior to the incisive foramen—is best resolved on cross-sectional imaging.[6]

Cross-sectional imaging: Cone-beam CT is the preferred modality for defining cleft shape, size, volume, nasal-floor involvement, and bone support of adjacent teeth, and low-dose, restricted field-of-view protocols are recommended given repeated lifetime exposures.[7] Systematic 3D reporting characterizes cleft location, dimensions at nasal floor, mid-alveolus, and crest, and graft integration after alveolar bone grafting.[8] Expected associated findings include missing or supernumerary teeth, oronasal fistulas, and maxillary growth restriction.[3]

Management and prognosis

Interpretation centers on confirming cleft extent and documenting dentoalveolar sequelae rather than treating the finding as a pathologic lesion.[3][8] Red flags warranting correlation include previously undocumented clefting, submucous cleft with velopharyngeal insufficiency, and associated anomalies suggesting a syndrome.[2] Care is best delivered by an ACPA-recognized multidisciplinary cleft/craniofacial team; the primary clinician's role is appropriate referral and longitudinal coordination.[9] Primary palatoplasty is generally performed between 6 and 14 months, with timing still debated; the TOPS randomized trial found better velopharyngeal function at 5 years with repair at 6 versus 12 months.[10] Alveolar bone grafting is typically timed to adjacent canine root development, around 9–12 years.[11]

ORAD reference data

Radiographic characteristics

18 characteristics

Banded distributions from the ORAD reference database.

Clinical Features

What is the sex of your patient? Female · commonly
What is the sex of your patient?
FindingFrequency
Male sometimes
Female commonly
Unknown rarely
What is the race of your patient? Nonblack · usually
What is the race of your patient?
FindingFrequency
Black occasionally
Nonblack usually
Unknown rarely
What is the age of your patient? 0 - 10 · usually
What is the age of your patient?
FindingFrequency
0 - 10 usually
11 - 25 occasionally
26 - 50 rarely
50 + rarely
Unknown rarely
Does your patient have pain or paresthesia? No pain · usually
Does your patient have pain or paresthesia?
FindingFrequency
Pain rarely
No pain usually
Unknown rarely

Radiographic Features

Which jaw contains the lesion? Maxilla only · usually
Which jaw contains the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Maxilla only usually
Mandible only not reported
Both jaws not reported
The lesion center is in what region ? Incisor region · usually
The lesion center is in what region ?
FindingFrequency
Incisor region usually
Canine/Premolar Region sometimes
Molar region not reported
Ramus region not reported
TMJ region not reported
Sinus region not reported
The relationship of the lesion to teeth is: Crown associated · sometimes
The relationship of the lesion to teeth is:
FindingFrequency
Crown associated sometimes
Root associated sometimes
Apex associated not reported
Missing tooth associated sometimes
Not tooth associated sometimes
Is the tooth associated with the lesion vital? Vital · usually
Is the tooth associated with the lesion vital?
FindingFrequency
Vital usually
Not vital rarely
Unknown rarely
Please estimate the number of lesions: One · usually
Please estimate the number of lesions:
FindingFrequency
One usually
Two sometimes
Three or more not reported
Generalized not reported
What is the maximum size of the lesion? Less than 2 cm · commonly
What is the maximum size of the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Less than 2 cm commonly
2 to 3 cm sometimes
Greater than 3 cm sometimes
Where is the origin of the lesion? Central · commonly
Where is the origin of the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Central commonly
Peripheral commonly
The borders of the lesion are: Corticated · commonly
The borders of the lesion are:
FindingFrequency
Corticated commonly
Defined but not corticated commonly
Diffuse not reported
The loculation of the lesion is: Not loculated · usually
The loculation of the lesion is:
FindingFrequency
Unilocular not reported
Multilocular not reported
Not loculated usually
The contents of the lesions are: Radiolucent · usually
The contents of the lesions are:
FindingFrequency
Radiolucent usually
Radiopaque not reported
Mixed rarely
Radiolucent with flecks rarely
Does the lesion contain one or more teeth ? Yes · commonly
Does the lesion contain one or more teeth ?
FindingFrequency
Yes commonly
No sometimes
Unknown sometimes
Does the lesion expand the bony cortex? No · usually
Does the lesion expand the bony cortex?
FindingFrequency
Yes not reported
No usually
Does the lesion cause root resorption ? No · usually
Does the lesion cause root resorption ?
FindingFrequency
Yes sometimes
No usually
Does the lesion cause tooth displacement or impaction? Yes · usually
Does the lesion cause tooth displacement or impaction?
FindingFrequency
Yes usually
No occasionally
Atlas sources

References

11 sources
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Build an interactive differential →

Nearest neighbours

Expand to full map ↗

This lesion (ringed) among its most radiographically similar entries. Region and origin must overlap, so every neighbour is a genuine differential.

Drag to explore · Ctrl/⌘ + scroll to zoom · click a neighbour to recentre

← All lesions