Overview and definition
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a malignant epithelial neoplasm of salivary gland origin with biphasic ductal-myoepithelial differentiation.[1][2] It is one of the most common malignant tumors of the minor salivary glands and the most common malignant salivary neoplasm of the maxillary sinus.[1][3] The tumor is characterized by slow but relentless growth, a hallmark propensity for perineural invasion, and a paradoxical combination of indolent clinical tempo with aggressive long-term behavior including late local recurrence and distant metastasis.[4][5] In the maxilla, ACC arises most frequently from the palatal minor salivary glands or the maxillary sinus mucosa, producing a soft-tissue mass that secondarily invades the underlying palatal bone, alveolar process, and adjacent structures.[6][7] The defining molecular alteration is a chromosomal rearrangement involving MYB or MYBL1, most commonly resulting in a MYB::NFIB fusion.[8][9] On dental radiographs, the tumor typically manifests as ill-defined bone destruction of the hard palate and alveolar process; cross-sectional imaging is essential for staging. Management centers on surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy.[10]
Terminology and classification
The WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours (5th edition, 2022/2024) classifies ACC as a malignant epithelial salivary gland tumor.[11][12] The historically used term "cylindroma" is obsolete and should be avoided, as it causes confusion with the unrelated dermal cylindroma.[2][13] The abbreviation ACC (or AdCC) is standard. When the tumor arises as a primary intraosseous lesion within the jawbone, the designation "primary intraosseous adenoid cystic carcinoma" (PIACC) is used.[14][15] A recently described morphologic variant with squamous differentiation and trabecular/macrocystic growth has been termed "metatypical adenoid cystic carcinoma".[11][16]
Epidemiology
- ACC accounts for approximately 1% of all head and neck malignancies and up to 10% of salivary gland neoplasms.[1][17]
- Among minor salivary gland tumors, ACC is one of the most frequent malignant histotypes; the palate is the single most common minor salivary gland site, followed by the maxillary sinus.[6][18]
- Peak incidence occurs in the fifth to sixth decades (mean age ~50–55 years), with a slight female predominance.[4][18]
- In the maxillary sinus specifically, ACC is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor; the maxillary sinus accounts for approximately 47% of sinonasal ACC.[7]
- Primary intraosseous ACC of the jaws is exceedingly rare, with fewer than 50 mandibular cases reported and even fewer in the maxilla; the mandible is affected 3–4 times more often than the maxilla in intraosseous cases.[14][19]
Clinical presentation
Presentation and symptoms
Most maxillary ACC presents as a firm, submucosal, non-ulcerated palatal swelling or a mass within the maxillary sinus.[3][6] The clinical course is insidious; symptom duration before diagnosis is often months to over a year.[20]
- Palatal tumors: painless or painful swelling of the hard palate, sometimes with overlying mucosal discoloration; the mucosa may remain intact until late stages.[6][21]
- Maxillary sinus tumors: nasal obstruction (25%), epistaxis (21%), facial pain or pressure (50%), and a palpable mass (88%) are common presenting complaints; most patients present with advanced (T3–T4) disease because the sinus cavity allows occult growth.[3][7]
Pain and neurologic findings
Pain is a prominent feature, reported in approximately 50% of cases, and should raise suspicion for perineural invasion.[3][22] Numbness or paresthesia of the palate, upper lip, or cheek (infraorbital nerve distribution) indicates involvement of branches of the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve (V2).[23][24] Cranial nerve deficits—including diplopia, facial weakness, or trigeminal sensory loss—suggest skull base extension and are late findings.[24][25]
Tempo and complications
ACC follows a protracted clinical course with a high cumulative risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis (most commonly to the lungs) that may manifest years to decades after initial treatment.[5][26] Lymph node metastasis is uncommon, occurring in fewer than 5% of cases at presentation.[7]
Radiographic findings
Location and distribution
Maxillary ACC most commonly involves the hard palate and posterior alveolar ridge, reflecting the density of minor salivary glands in these regions.[6][20] Maxillary sinus tumors center within the antrum and extend into the palate, nasal cavity, or orbit.[3][7] Primary intraosseous ACC of the maxilla is exceptionally rare; when it occurs, it may present as a periapical radiolucency mimicking inflammatory disease.[27][28]
Periphery and shape
- Palatal and alveolar lesions typically produce ill-defined, irregular radiolucencies of the hard palate and alveolar bone on panoramic and periapical radiographs, without a corticated border.[29][30]
- Intraosseous cases may occasionally show well-defined or multilocular radiolucencies that simulate odontogenic cysts or ameloblastoma, though this presentation is rare.[14]
- Maxillary sinus tumors may appear as opacification of the antrum with destruction of the sinus walls; the bony margins are typically ragged and non-corticated.[31][32]
Internal architecture
- The lesion is predominantly radiolucent without internal mineralization on conventional radiographs.[29]
- Internal calcification is uncommon, reported in approximately 13% of palatal ACC on CT.[33]
- Tubular-subtype tumors may produce small cystic internal patterns, whereas solid-subtype tumors tend to appear homogeneously dense on cross-sectional imaging.[31][32]
Effects on teeth and adjacent structures
- Root resorption of adjacent teeth is not a prominent feature but may occur when the tumor directly abuts the dental roots.[29]
- Tooth displacement and widening of the periodontal ligament space can be seen when the tumor infiltrates the alveolar process.[27][28]
- Periapical radiolucencies mimicking endodontic pathology have been reported in intraosseous cases, leading to misdiagnosis as periapical cysts or granulomas.[14][27]
Extent and cortical involvement
Bone invasion is a hallmark of maxillary ACC and is present in the majority of cases at diagnosis.[22][30] Three radiographic patterns of bone involvement have been described:[30]
- Erosive type: smooth, pressure-remodeled cortical destruction without marrow infiltration
- Diffuse invasive type: irregular, moth-eaten or permeative bone destruction with tumor infiltrating marrow spaces; associated with the solid histologic subtype
- Minimal change type: subtle cortical defects with histologically confirmed tumor extension through small bony perforations; may be radiographically occult on conventional films
Palatal bone erosion is present in approximately 76% of palatal ACC.[33] CBCT and thin-section CT improve detection of cortical thinning, cortical perforation, and early bone destruction compared with panoramic radiography, particularly in the maxilla where superimposition limits conventional film interpretation.[34][35]
Osseous changes related to perineural spread
A distinctive feature of maxillary ACC is erosion and enlargement of neural foramina, canals, and fossae along the path of perineural tumor spread. In palatal ACC, the most frequently affected sites are:[33]
- Greater palatine foramen/canal (76%)
- Pterygopalatine fossa (45%)
- Foramen rotundum (34%)
- Vidian canal (32%)
Affected foramina and canals are enlarged to a mean of 187% of the contralateral normal size.[33] Surrounding bone sclerosis adjacent to the tumor is occasionally seen and, among salivary gland carcinomas, is significantly more frequent in ACC than in other histotypes.[36] Erosion or enlargement of foramina on bone-algorithm CT has 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for MRI-confirmed perineural spread.[33]
Variants
- Primary intraosseous ACC: presents as a central jaw radiolucency—unilocular or multilocular—that may simulate an odontogenic cyst, ameloblastoma, or periapical pathology; the mandible is far more commonly affected than the maxilla.[14][15]
- Maxillary sinus ACC: appears as antral opacification with aggressive bony destruction of the sinus walls; the tubular subtype may show a cribriform (sieve-like) pattern of bone destruction with relatively well-defined margins, whereas the solid subtype produces more aggressive lytic destruction.[31][32]
Other imaging findings
CT findings
Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a soft-tissue-density mass with mild to moderate enhancement.[22][31] Bone-window CT is valuable for detecting cortical erosion, foraminal enlargement along neural pathways, and the pattern of bone destruction (erosive vs. permeative).[33][37] In maxillary sinus ACC, CT can differentiate histologic subtypes: tubular tumors tend to be smaller with well-defined margins and cribriform bone destruction, whereas solid tumors are larger with irregular margins and aggressive lytic destruction.[31][32]
MRI findings
MRI is the preferred modality for evaluating perineural tumor spread, skull base invasion, orbital extension, and bone marrow involvement.[10][38] ACC typically shows iso- to hypointense signal on T1-weighted images and hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images, with marked heterogeneous enhancement after gadolinium administration.[31][39] On T2-weighted images, low signal intensity correlates with the highly cellular solid subtype and a worse prognosis, whereas high signal intensity corresponds to the less cellular cribriform or tubular subtypes.[39] MRI sensitivity for detecting perineural spread ranges from 73% to 100%.[38][40] Key findings include nerve enlargement, abnormal nerve enhancement, and replacement of normal perineural fat planes along the trigeminal nerve pathway from the palate through the pterygopalatine fossa to the foramen rotundum, Meckel cave, and cavernous sinus.[23][24]
PET/CT
FDG-PET/CT may be considered for staging, particularly to evaluate distant metastases and to confirm metabolically active perineural disease along neural segments.[10][23]
Differential diagnosis
Maxillary ACC must be distinguished from other malignant and benign processes that produce bone destruction or soft-tissue masses in the palate and maxillary sinus. The differential depends on whether the lesion presents as a palatal/alveolar mass with bone destruction or as a primary intraosseous radiolucency.
| Entity | Why it is considered | Best discriminator |
|---|---|---|
| Mucoepidermoid carcinoma | Minor salivary gland tumor of the palate with bone destruction | ACC lacks mucin-producing cells and squamous differentiation; MEC harbors CRTC1::MAML2 fusion rather than MYB::NFIB[9][19] |
| Polymorphous adenocarcinoma | Low-grade palatal salivary gland malignancy with infiltrative growth | Polymorphous adenocarcinoma shows diverse architectural patterns with bland cytology and PRKD1 mutations; it lacks the biphasic cribriform pattern and MYB rearrangement of ACC[9] |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus | Aggressive maxillary sinus mass with bone destruction and soft-tissue extension | SCC shows keratinization and dysplastic squamous epithelium; it lacks the biphasic basaloid morphology and perineural predilection characteristic of ACC[10][41] |
| Pleomorphic adenoma | Palatal submucosal mass, most common salivary gland tumor at this site | Pleomorphic adenoma is well-circumscribed without bone destruction; its mesenchymal (chondromyxoid) matrix differs from the basement-membrane-type matrix of ACC[1][26] |
The highest-risk diagnostic pitfall is misidentifying a palatal ACC as a benign pleomorphic adenoma or, in intraosseous cases, as an odontogenic cyst or periapical inflammatory lesion, which delays definitive diagnosis.[14][27] Incisional biopsy is essential for any persistent palatal mass or atypical maxillary radiolucency, and histopathologic examination with immunohistochemistry and molecular testing (MYB FISH or sequencing) should be pursued when the diagnosis is uncertain.[9][15]
Histopathology
Microscopic features
ACC is a biphasic tumor composed of ductal (luminal) epithelial cells and abluminal myoepithelial/basal cells.[1][2] Three recognized growth patterns occur in variable combinations:[1][2]
- Cribriform: the most common and classic pattern; islands of basaloid cells with sharply demarcated, punched-out pseudocystic spaces ("Swiss cheese" pattern) filled with basophilic basement-membrane-type material
- Tubular: bilayered tubular structures with inner cuboidal luminal cells and outer myoepithelial cells, surrounded by hyalinized stroma
- Solid: sheets of basaloid cells without pseudocystic or tubular formations; associated with higher grade and worse prognosis
Most tumors contain a mixture of patterns; grading is based on the predominant component, with the solid pattern conferring the worst prognosis.[20][26]
Immunohistochemistry
- Myoepithelial cells stain positively for smooth muscle actin, S-100, p63, and calponin.[2]
- Luminal cells express CK7 and EMA.[2]
- c-KIT (CD117) is strongly and diffusely positive in ACC regardless of grade.[2]
- MYB nuclear expression is characteristic and supports the diagnosis.[15]
Molecular findings
The hallmark molecular alteration is the t(6;9)(q22-23;p23-24) translocation producing a MYB::NFIB fusion, present in approximately 50–80% of cases.[8][9][42] A smaller subset harbors MYBL1::NFIB fusions.[8][42] Rare noncanonical fusions (EWSR1::MYB, FUS::MYB) have been identified, predominantly in non-major-salivary-gland sites.[43][44] Transcriptomic profiling has identified two molecular subtypes: AdCC-I (MYC-upregulated, NOTCH-mutated, more aggressive) and AdCC-II (TP63-upregulated, more indolent).[45] Copy number losses at 6q and 14q have been associated with poor prognosis independent of histologic pattern.[46]
Radiologic-pathologic correlation
The solid histologic subtype correlates with diffuse invasive bone destruction on imaging, lower ADC values on diffusion-weighted MRI, and low T2 signal intensity.[30][31][39] Tubular and cribriform subtypes tend to produce erosive or cribriform patterns of bone destruction with relatively better-defined margins.[30][31]
Management and prognosis
Workup and referral
The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers recommend complete head and neck CT with contrast and/or MRI with and without contrast for all maxillary tumors, with chest CT to evaluate for pulmonary metastases.[10] FDG-PET/CT may be considered.[10] Biopsy is required; for maxillary sinus lesions, the preferred route is transnasal.[10] Multidisciplinary consultation is recommended, and referral to a specialized center should be considered given the rarity and histopathologic diversity of these tumors.[10]
Definitive treatment
Surgical resection with clear margins is the primary treatment.[5][10] For palatal and alveolar ACC, this typically requires partial or total maxillectomy with resection of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle to address perineural invasion.[6][47] The NCCN algorithm provides stage-specific guidance:[10]
- T1–2, N0 adenoid cystic: resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (preferred), or observation may be considered if margins are negative and no perineural spread is present
- T3–4a, N0 or any T with N+: complete resection (with neck dissection if N+) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary site and neck
- T4b or unresectable: definitive radiotherapy ± systemic therapy
Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for all resected ACC, particularly when adverse features are present (perineural invasion, positive or close margins, lymphovascular invasion).[10][48] Radiation doses ≥60 Gy are associated with improved local control.[48][49] Elective neck dissection is generally not required given the low rate of nodal metastasis but should be performed when clinical or radiographic nodal disease is present.[7][50]
Recurrence and prognosis
- Five-year overall survival rates range from 62% to 75%; 10-year rates decline to 35–62%, reflecting the characteristic pattern of late recurrence.[3][18][26]
- Local recurrence occurs in 16–30% of patients; distant metastasis (predominantly pulmonary) develops in 20–38%.[3][7][26]
- Median time to distant metastasis is approximately 46 months, but very late recurrences (>15 years) are well documented.[5][51]
- Adverse prognostic factors include solid histologic pattern, advanced T stage, positive surgical margins, perineural invasion of named nerves, and skull base involvement.[20][26][48]
- Sinonasal primary site confers worse outcomes compared with major salivary gland ACC.[52][53]
Surveillance
Given the propensity for very late recurrence, clinical follow-up should extend at least 15 years and ideally lifelong, with periodic cross-sectional imaging and chest imaging.[5]
Special considerations
Molecular subtypes and emerging targets
Transcriptomic classification into AdCC-I (NOTCH-mutated, MYC-driven) and AdCC-II (TP63-driven) subtypes has prognostic implications and may guide future targeted therapy.[45] Copy number variation–based molecular classification using 6q-loss and 14q-loss markers has been shown to improve prognostic accuracy beyond histologic grading alone.[46] For recurrent or metastatic disease, the NCCN recommends biomarker testing including androgen receptor, HER2, NTRK1/2/3, FGFR, BRAF, RET, MSI/dMMR, TMB, and PD-L1 prior to systemic therapy.[10] No FDA-approved targeted therapies currently exist specifically for ACC, but NTRK inhibitors (e.g., larotrectinib, entrectinib) are approved for NTRK fusion–positive tumors regardless of histology, and clinical trials investigating NOTCH pathway inhibitors and other agents are ongoing.[17]